[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478D4E35.8000208@nttdata.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 09:22:13 +0900
From: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO #6 retry 02/21] Add struct vfsmount to struct task_struct.
Hello.
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> I must say I personally prefer the apparmor approach.
No problem.
> But I'd recommend
> you get together and get this piece pushed on its own, whichever version
> you can agree on.
TOMOYO can use AppArmor's patch.
> Yes it needs a user, but at this point I would think
> both tomoyo and apparmor have had enough visibility that everyone knows
> the intended users.
Not only AppArmor and TOMOYO but also SELinux want to use "vfsmount".
(http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=120005904211942&w=2)
> It seems to me you're both being held up by this piece, and getting
> another full posting of either tomoyo or apparmor isn't going to help,
> so hopefully you can combine your efforts to get this solved.
We welcome AppArmor's vfsmount patches, but I wonder why AppArmor's
vfsmount patches are not merged yet.
What prevents AppArmor's vfsmount patches from merging into -mm tree?
Regards.
Kentaro Takeda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists