linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <478D72DD.6030107@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:58:37 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.ritz-ml@...ssonline.ch,
	jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk

Hello,

Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>   mprintk_set_header(&mp, KERN_INFO "ata%u.%2u: ", 1, 0);
>>   mprintk_push(&mp, "ATA %d", 7);
>>   mprintk_push(&mp, ", %u sectors\n", 1024);
>>   mprintk(&mp, "everything seems dandy\n");
> 
> Looks pretty good to me except that I would change mprintk_push to
> mprintk_add or mprintk_append (I think that I prefer _add).

I think push and flush sound good when used together but then again the
flush function isn't visible in the interface and push has LIFO ring to
it.  I'm okay with add.  append seems a bit too long.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/