[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <88976638-FBF2-45CB-9ED3-500ED2623916@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:36:24 -0500
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: neilb@...e.de, jengelh@...putergmbh.de, kzak@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org,
linuxram@...ibm.com, viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts
On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> Hey, I just found /proc/X/mountstats. How does this fit in to the
>> big
>> picture?
>
> It seems to show some counters for NFS mounts, no other filesystem
> uses it. Format looks rather less nice, than /proc/X/mounts (why do
> we need long english sentences under /proc?).
I introduced /proc/self/mountstats because we need a way for non-
block-device-based file systems to report I/O statistics. Everything
else I tried was rejected, and apparently what we ended up with was
reviewed by only a handful of people, so no one else likes it or uses
it.
It can go away for all I care, as long as we retain some flexible
mechanism for non-block-based file systems to report I/O stats. As
far as I am aware, there are only two user utilities that understand
and parse this data, and I maintain both.
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists