linux-kernel - Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:17:27 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
cc:	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
	viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts


On Jan 17 2008 11:33, Neil Brown wrote:
>On Thursday January 17, jengelh@...putergmbh.de wrote:
>> 
>> On Jan 17 2008 00:43, Karel Zak wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Seems like a plain bad idea to me.  There will be any number of home-made
>> >> /proc/mounts parsers and we don't know what they do.
>> >
>> > So, let's use /proc/mounts_v2  ;-)
>> 
>> Was not it like "don't use /proc for new things"?
>
>I thought it was "don't use /proc for new things that aren't process
>related".
>
>And as the mount table is per process......

You are right. I'm still in the world where CLONE_NEWNS is not used all
that much in the daily routine, either by the distro or by me.

>In the tradition of stat, statm, status, maybe the former should be
> /proc/$PID/mountm

What next - /proc/pid/mountus? :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/