[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478EC131.8030103@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:45:05 -0500
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org,
linuxram@...ibm.com, viro@....linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [patch] VFS: extend /proc/mounts
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Seems like a plain bad idea to me. There will be any number of home-made
> /proc/mounts parsers and we don't know what they do.
>
There is a lot of precedent for adding fields at the end. Since the
last fields in current /proc/*/mounts are dummy fields anyway, it
doesn't matter if the homegrown parsers concatenate the additional
information to those.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists