[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200540141.17967.8.camel@brick>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:22:21 -0800
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/7] Use shorter addresses in i386 segfault printks
On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 22:11 -0500, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 23:27 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c | 2 +-
> >
> > Could use exactly the same in fault_64.c
> >
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >> - "%s%s[%d]: segfault at %08lx ip %08lx sp %08lx error %lx\n",
> >> + "%s%s[%d]: segfault at %lx ip %08lx sp %08lx error %lx\n",
> >> #else
> >> "%s%s[%d]: segfault at %lx ip %lx sp %lx error %lx\n",
> >> #endif
> >
> > With the ongoing unification work, it would be nice if we could come
> > up with a way to unify printks like this. Anyone have any bright ideas
> > on a format that will keep the current alignment on 32 and 64 bit with
> > the same syntax, or will these tiny ifdefs keep sprouting?
> >
>
> Casting to (void *) and using %p is probably your best bet. That's what
> it really is anyway.
>
> Note: in the kernel right now, %p doesn't have the leading 0x prefix,
> which it probably should...
Well, that won't exactly be the nicest looking solution in places, maybe
a shorthand could be developed for this, or could another format
specifier be added that implicitly does the (void *) cast? (%P perhaps)
Harvey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists