[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080118091422.GF24337@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:14:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and boot lockup during locking self-test
* Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org> wrote:
> Included Ingo in CC because I think he did the locking test.
>
> The following is copied from a different boot, but looks the same to my
> eye as what I got on the console:
>
> ------------------------
> | Locking API testsuite:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | spin |wlock |rlock |mutex | wsem | rsem |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> A-A deadlock: ok |
>
> It just sticks there. I assume that means a problem with wlock?
does the patch below from Nick fix it? It went upstream just after
rc8-mm1 so rc8-mm1 might be missing it.
Ingo
------------------>
commit 5a26db5bd25cf4bf32ae9fa9f6136b6b6d5b45c5
Author: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Date: Wed Jan 16 09:51:58 2008 +0100
lockdep: fix internal double unlock during self-test
Lockdep, during self-test (when it was simulating double unlocks) was
sometimes unconditionally unlocking a spinlock when it had not been
locked. This won't work for ticket locks.
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 723bd9f..4335f12 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2943,9 +2943,10 @@ void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
struct list_head *head;
unsigned long flags;
int i;
+ int locked;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
- graph_lock();
+ locked = graph_lock();
/*
* Unhash all classes that were created by this module:
@@ -2959,7 +2960,8 @@ void lockdep_free_key_range(void *start, unsigned long size)
zap_class(class);
}
- graph_unlock();
+ if (locked)
+ graph_unlock();
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -2969,6 +2971,7 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
struct list_head *head;
unsigned long flags;
int i, j;
+ int locked;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
@@ -2987,7 +2990,7 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
* Debug check: in the end all mapped classes should
* be gone.
*/
- graph_lock();
+ locked = graph_lock();
for (i = 0; i < CLASSHASH_SIZE; i++) {
head = classhash_table + i;
if (list_empty(head))
@@ -3000,7 +3003,8 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock)
}
}
}
- graph_unlock();
+ if (locked)
+ graph_unlock();
out_restore:
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists