[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JFnbj-0008SD-57@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:33:51 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: salikhmetov@...il.com
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com, miklos@...redi.hu, r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl,
hidave.darkstar@...il.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 1/2] Massive code cleanup of sys_msync()
> unsigned long end;
> - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + int error, unmapped_error;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> - int unmapped_error = 0;
> - int error = -EINVAL;
> + struct mm_struct *mm;
>
> + error = -EINVAL;
I think you may have misunderstood my last comment. These are OK:
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
int unmapped_error = 0;
int error = -EINVAL;
This is not so good:
int error, unmapped_error;
This is the worst:
int error = -EINVAL, unmapped_error = 0;
So I think the original code is fine as it is.
Othewise patch looks OK now.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists