linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1JFnho-0008TH-5G@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:40:08 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	salikhmetov@...il.com
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
	riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
	jesper.juhl@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	protasnb@...il.com, miklos@...redi.hu, r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl,
	hidave.darkstar@...il.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 0/2] Fixing the issue with memory-mapped file times

> 4. Performance test was done using the program available from the
> following link:
> 
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14493
> 
> Result: the impact of the changes was negligible for files of a few
> hundred megabytes.

Could you also test with ext4 and post some numbers?  Afaik, ext4 uses
nanosecond timestamps, so the time updating code would be exercised
more during the page faults.

What about performance impact on msync(MS_ASYNC)?  Could you please do
some measurment of that as well?

Thanks,
Miklos

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/