[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080118081339.3da1dceb@areia>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:13:39 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix wrong sized spinlock flags argument
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:05:06 -0800
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Applied.
> >
> > However, the patch itself didn't apply cleanly, because in my souce tree,
> > these two lines are in a different order:
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > >
> > > pci_set_power_state(pci_dev, PCI_D0);
> > > pci_restore_state(pci_dev);
> >
> > but I actually think your order is the *correct* one (because I'm not at
> > all sure that config space writes are even guaranteed to make a difference
> > when in D3cold).
>
> I was actually using 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 . The code looked similar enough,
> but I must have overlooked the fact that the lines above got switched..
There were lots of change on saa7134, including the implementation of S1/S3.
I'll run some tests here fixing the order and apply Daniel's patch.
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists