linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix wrong sized spinlock flags argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:05:06 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix wrong sized spinlock flags argument


On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 15:48 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Applied.
> 
> However, the patch itself didn't apply cleanly, because in my souce tree, 
> these two lines are in a different order:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Daniel Walker wrote:
> >  
> >  	pci_set_power_state(pci_dev, PCI_D0);
> >  	pci_restore_state(pci_dev);
> 
> but I actually think your order is the *correct* one (because I'm not at 
> all sure that config space writes are even guaranteed to make a difference 
> when in D3cold).

I was actually using 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 . The code looked similar enough,
but I must have overlooked the fact that the lines above got switched..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/