linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1200665079.4001.32.camel@cinder.waste.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:04:39 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux-tiny@...enic.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional
	arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling


On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 14:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [ Sidenote: "too small" and "too insignificant" is not a patch attribute
>   that is in my vocabulary - by definition the best patches are very
>   small and very insignificant (they just happen to end up doing
>   something cool a 1000 steps later ;-) 99% of our problems come from
>   'too large' and 'too intrusive' patches. ]

I tend to agree, but it's well-established that not everyone here is so
patient.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/