[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080118142308.GD12796@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:23:08 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@...ibm.com>
Cc: Ric Wheeler <ric@....com>, Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Valerie Henson <val.henson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] document ext3 requirements (was Re: [RFD] Incremental
fsck)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 04:31:48PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> But I heard some years ago from a disk drive engineer that that is a myth
> just like the rotational energy thing. I added that to the discussion,
> but admitted that I haven't actually seen a disk drive write a partial
> sector.
Well, it would be impossible or at least very hard to see that in
practice, right? My understanding is that drives do sector-level
checksums, so if there was a partially written sector, the checksum
would be bogus and the drive would return an error when you tried to
read from it.
> Ted brought up the separate issue of the host sending garbage to the disk
> device because its own power is failing at the same time, which makes the
> integrity at the disk level moot (or even undesirable, as you'd rather
> write a bad sector than a good one with the wrong data).
Yep, exactly. It would be interesting to see if this happens on
modern hardware; all of the evidence I've had for this is years old at
this point.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists