[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JFvgx-0000zz-2C@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:11:47 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
CC: peterz@...radead.org, miklos@...redi.hu, salikhmetov@...il.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, jakob@...hought.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
riel@...hat.com, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com, r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl,
hidave.darkstar@...il.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped
files
> And even in that four-liner, I suspect that the *last* two lines are
> actually incorrect: there's no point in updating the file time when the
> page *becomes* dirty,
Actually all four lines do that. The first two for a write access on
a present, read-only pte, the other two for a write on a non-present
pte.
> we should update the file time when it is marked
> clean, and "msync(MS_SYNC)" should update it as part of *that*.
That would need a new page flag (PG_mmap_dirty?). Do we have one
available?
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists