[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080118132850.044537e5@bree.surriel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:28:50 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
miklos@...redi.hu, salikhmetov@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
jakob@...hought.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
valdis.kletnieks@...edu, ksm@...dk, staubach@...hat.com,
jesper.juhl@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
protasnb@...il.com, r.e.wolff@...wizard.nl,
hidave.darkstar@...il.com, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v6 2/2] Updating ctime and mtime for memory-mapped
files
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:11:47 +0100
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> > And even in that four-liner, I suspect that the *last* two lines are
> > actually incorrect: there's no point in updating the file time when the
> > page *becomes* dirty,
>
> Actually all four lines do that. The first two for a write access on
> a present, read-only pte, the other two for a write on a non-present
> pte.
>
> > we should update the file time when it is marked
> > clean, and "msync(MS_SYNC)" should update it as part of *that*.
>
> That would need a new page flag (PG_mmap_dirty?). Do we have one
> available?
I thought the page writing stuff looked at (and cleared) the pte
dirty bit, too?
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists