linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] percpu: Per cpu code simplification fixup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080118203928.GB3079@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:39:29 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	travis@....com
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] percpu: Per cpu code simplification fixup


* travis@....com <travis@....com> wrote:

> This patchset simplifies the code that arches need to maintain to 
> support per cpu functionality. Most of the code is moved into arch 
> independent code. Only a minimal set of definitions is kept for each 
> arch.
> 
> The patch also unifies the x86 arch so that there is only a single 
> asm-x86/percpu.h
> 
> Based on: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1

just to make sure i got it right: due to the multi-arch scope of this 
patchset, this is for -mm, right?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/