linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] percpu: Per cpu code simplification fixup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4791115A.1030209@sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:51:38 -0800
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] percpu: Per cpu code simplification fixup

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * travis@....com <travis@....com> wrote:
> 
>> This patchset simplifies the code that arches need to maintain to 
>> support per cpu functionality. Most of the code is moved into arch 
>> independent code. Only a minimal set of definitions is kept for each 
>> arch.
>>
>> The patch also unifies the x86 arch so that there is only a single 
>> asm-x86/percpu.h
>>
>> Based on: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1
> 
> just to make sure i got it right: due to the multi-arch scope of this 
> patchset, this is for -mm, right?
> 
> 	Ingo


Yes, it is.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/