linux-kernel - Re: non-choice related config entries within choice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801190538510.17507@scrub.home>
Date:	Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:44:50 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, david-b@...bell.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: non-choice related config entries within choice

Hi,

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> But one feature I really would like to see is named chocies so we can do stuff like:
> 
> choice X86_PROCESSOR
> 
> config GENERIC_PROCESSOR
> 	bool "A generic X86 processor"
> endchoice
> 
> 
> ...
> 
> choice PPC_PROCESSOR
> 
> config GENERIC_PROCESSOR
> 	bool "A generic PowerPC processor
> 
> endchoice
> 
> The issue here is that we do not today allow the same config option
> to appear if more than one choice.

What I have in mind is slightly different, above choices would simply be 
called PROCESSOR, which would tell kconfig that all choices belong to the 
same group.

bye, Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/