| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080119045415.GA27628@one.firstfloor.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:54:15 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chodorenko Michail <misha@....by>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Celeron Core > It will relative to not throttling. No it will not. Please reread Dominik's mail I linked to. It explains it clearly. > You made a claim that is -physically impossible- as stated, a claim I've > seen here before and I'm correcting it. If something reduces heat, it > must save power *by the definition of heat and power*. And if you reduce > power usage, you will make your battery last longer. I think the misunderstanding on your side is relative to what there is less heat. Throttling essentially reduces temporary heat spikes on the silicon, but does not make the system overall take less power or generate less heat as measured over a longer time because it will be idle less. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists