linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4794BAD5.7030606@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:31:33 +0100
From:	Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux-tiny@...enic.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86:	fix	unconditional	arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling

On 01/18/2008 06:10 PM, Matt Mackall wrote:
>> Sounds fine! Don't hesitate to let us know about the lower-hanging fruit
>> you're thinking about. Here are the main things I have so far:
>>
>>     * Ideas in the existing Linux-Tiny patchset.
>>     * Disable support for non-Intel processors in x86 (cyrix.c,
>>       centaur.c, transmeta.c, nexgen.c, umc.c in arch/x86/kernel/cpu).
>>       As far as I remember, I saved 15 KB when I first experimented with
>>       this).
>>     
>
> Isn't that already in -tiny?
>   
Oops, yes! I'll update these patches and post them again as soon as I
get a chance (hopefully soon).

Thanks for your support,

:-)

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, Free Electrons
Free Embedded Linux Training Materials
on http://free-electrons.com/training
(More than 1500 pages!)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/