linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:45:40 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7 to 2.6.24-rc8 possible regression

Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> After running screen found in dmesg. It was not happening before.
> 
> [625138.248257]
> [625138.248260] =============================================
> [625138.248542] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [625138.248686] 2.6.24-rc8-devel #2
> [625138.248821] ---------------------------------------------
> [625138.248963] screen/18164 is trying to acquire lock:
> [625138.249101]  (&q->lock){++..}, at: [<c01175ff>] __wake_up+0x15/0x42
> [625138.249454]
> [625138.249456] but task is already holding lock:
> [625138.249724]  (&q->lock){++..}, at: [<c01175ff>] __wake_up+0x15/0x42
> [625138.250073]
> [625138.250075] other info that might help us debug this:
> [625138.250343] 2 locks held by screen/18164:
> [625138.250477]  #0:  (&tty->atomic_read_lock){--..}, at: [<c0231a6c>] 
> read_chan+0x18f/0x50b
> [625138.250960]  #1:  (&q->lock){++..}, at: [<c01175ff>] __wake_up+0x15/0x42
> [625138.251356]
> [625138.251357] stack backtrace:
> [625138.251623] Pid: 18164, comm: screen Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8-devel #2
> [625138.251764]  [<c0105e84>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
> [625138.251959]  [<c010682c>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
> [625138.252150]  [<c0107123>] dump_stack+0x6c/0x72
> [625138.252338]  [<c01384c0>] __lock_acquire+0x172/0xb8c
> [625138.252533]  [<c01392a7>] lock_acquire+0x5f/0x78
> [625138.252725]  [<c032afa7>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x34/0x44
> [625138.252920]  [<c01175ff>] __wake_up+0x15/0x42
> [625138.253108]  [<c0186a16>] ep_poll_safewake+0x8e/0xbf
> [625138.253300]  [<c01876df>] ep_poll_callback+0x9f/0xac
> [625138.253491]  [<c0115d36>] __wake_up_common+0x32/0x5c
> [625138.253688]  [<c011761b>] __wake_up+0x31/0x42
> [625138.253878]  [<c022c803>] tty_wakeup+0x4f/0x54
> [625138.254070]  [<c0232c7c>] pty_unthrottle+0x15/0x21
> [625138.254258]  [<c022ffe3>] check_unthrottle+0x2e/0x30
> [625138.254445]  [<c0231cf4>] read_chan+0x417/0x50b
> [625138.254633]  [<c022ec67>] tty_read+0x66/0xac
> [625138.254819]  [<c01628dc>] vfs_read+0x8e/0x117
> [625138.255004]  [<c0162d10>] sys_read+0x3d/0x61
> [625138.255190]  [<c0104dee>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0xa5
> [625138.255376]  =======================

Do you have Peter's lockdep annotation patch for epoll applied?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/13/84
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ---= =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/