linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4794384A.6080705@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:34 +0800
From:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: update e820 instead of updating end_pfn v2

Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> That change is good agreed, but I would suggest to put it into a separate
>>> patch with a description
>>>
>> Perhaps like this:
>>
>> if (l & (Tom2Enabled|Tom2ForceMemTypeWB))
>> 	return 1;
> 
> That's not equivalent.
> 
> -Andi
> 

The equivalence is:

if ((1 & Tom2Enabled) && (1 & Tom2ForceMemTypeWB))
	return 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/