linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801231211.43637.andi@firstfloor.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:11:43 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	apw@...dowen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Relax restrictions on setting CONFIG_NUMA on x86


> > I was pretty sure that a !NUMAQ i386 CONFIG_NUMA build
> > already used that.
>
> Presumably a GENERICARCH configuration

GENERICARCH includes SUMMIT so yes.

> > At least that was the case when I last looked. If that
> > has changed it must have bitrotted recently.
>
> I don't think it has bit-rotted. I was just not using a GENERICARCH
> configuration.

And no SUMMIT either?  Ok you already answered that later.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/