lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:12:39 -0800 (PST) From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de> To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jplatte@...sa.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, James.Bottomley@...eleye.com, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de> Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX ----- Original Message ---- > From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com> > To: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@...bisoft.de> > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>; Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>; Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>; Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>; Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>; jplatte@...sa.net; Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>; James.Bottomley@...eleye.com; Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>; Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>; Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 12:40:52 AM > Subject: Re: regression: 100% io-wait with 2.6.24-rcX > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:25:15AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > [root@...dm52 ~]# dmsetup table > > VolGroup00-LogVol02: 0 350945280 linear 104:2 67109248 > > VolGroup00-LogVol01: 0 8388608 linear 104:2 418054528 > > VolGroup00-LogVol00: 0 67108864 linear 104:2 384 > > The IO should pass straight through simple linear targets like > that without needing to get broken up, so I wouldn't expect those patches to > make any difference in this particular case. > Alasdair, LVM/DM are off the hook :-) I converted one box to direct using partitions and the performance is the same disappointment as with LVM/DM. Thanks anyway for looking at my problem. I will move the discussion now to a new thread, targetting CCISS directly. Cheers Martin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists