[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801231224180.12676@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:25:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Kyle McMartin <kyle@...isc-linux.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: constify function pointer tables
On Jan 23 2008 18:41, Bryan Wu wrote:
>Oh, this patch does not touch all, following is the missing list:
>---
[...]
>arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c:static struct seq_operations ioc_seq_ops = {
>arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c:struct seq_operations pfm_seq_ops = {
>arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c:struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
>arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn2_smp.c:static struct seq_operations
(and more)
[...]
They were sent as other separate patches to each maintainer.
(without lkml, would have been a needless patchbomb.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists