[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <386072610801230416v4ecb364aqe69a7e3ec95a8161@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:16:01 +0800
From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>
To: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ivan Kokshaysky" <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
"Bryan Wu" <bryan.wu@...log.com>,
"Mikael Starvik" <starvik@...s.com>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Hirokazu Takata" <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Roman Zippel" <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Kyle McMartin" <kyle@...isc-linux.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <matthew@....cx>,
"Chris Zankel" <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: constify function pointer tables
On Jan 23, 2008 7:25 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de> wrote:
>
> On Jan 23 2008 18:41, Bryan Wu wrote:
> >Oh, this patch does not touch all, following is the missing list:
> >---
> [...]
> >arch/ia64/hp/common/sba_iommu.c:static struct seq_operations ioc_seq_ops = {
> >arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c:struct seq_operations pfm_seq_ops = {
> >arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c:struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
> >arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn2_smp.c:static struct seq_operations
> (and more)
> [...]
>
> They were sent as other separate patches to each maintainer.
> (without lkml, would have been a needless patchbomb.)
>
Oh, don't know that. I worried a lot, -:))
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists