linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:52:13 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:44:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
> > 
> > Here are a pretty large number of kobject, documentation, and driver
> > core patches against your 2.6.24 git tree.
> 
> I've merged it all, but it causes lots of scary warnings:
> 
>  - from the purely broken ones:
> 
> 	ehci_hcd: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
> 
>  - to the scary ones:
> 
> 	sysfs: duplicate filename 'ehci_hcd' can not be created
> 	WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:424 sysfs_add_one()
> 	Pid: 610, comm: insmod Tainted: GF       2.6.24-gb47711bf #28
> 	
> 	Call Trace:
> 	 [<ffffffff802bd63c>] sysfs_add_one+0x54/0xbd
> 	 [<ffffffff802bdbc0>] create_dir+0x4f/0x87
> 	 [<ffffffff802bdc2d>] sysfs_create_dir+0x35/0x4a
> 	 [<ffffffff803154c8>] kobject_get+0x12/0x17
> 	 [<ffffffff80315607>] kobject_add_internal+0xd9/0x194
> 	 [<ffffffff8031579c>] kobject_add_varg+0x54/0x61
> 	 [<ffffffff80261efe>] __alloc_pages+0x66/0x2ee
> 	 [<ffffffff80315321>] kobject_init+0x42/0x82
> 	 [<ffffffff80315843>] kobject_init_and_add+0x9a/0xa7
> 	 [<ffffffff802722c0>] __vmalloc_area_node+0x111/0x135
> 	 [<ffffffff8025546b>] mod_sysfs_init+0x6e/0x83
> 	 [<ffffffff802561e8>] sys_init_module+0xa3d/0x1833
> 	 [<ffffffff8028ebd5>] dput+0x1c/0x10b
> 	 [<ffffffff8020b3be>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
> 
> and the problem seems to be that it does all these checks even for modules 
> that will never be loaded, because I use my own kernel, but with the 
> default Fedora initrd (which is trying to load modules for stuff that I 
> already have built in).
> 
> Very annoying.

That's really wierd, I don't see that at all here just running with your
2.6.24 + my git tree and lots of USB drivers built into the kernel also
(like ehci_hcd).

I'll try to reproduce it on your merged git tree now...

> Can we please do that *after* the module loading symbol checks have run, 
> so that when you try to load a module that will not load, it won't 
> complain about these silly things?
> 
> (You can probably trigger this by simply trying to load a module that was 
> compiled for another kernel version - it will fail fine, but in failing it 
> will then generate all these incorrect warnings!)
> 
> Now it incorrectly taints my kernel, for no good reason.

$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/tainted
0

Odd...

$ uname -r
2.6.24-ge374a2bf-dirty

Strange, I thought that the uname id would show the git version that you
were running, but that doesn't show a valid id.  But that's probably a
different issue in the build system somewhere...

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/