linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: trim ram need to check if mtrr is there v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <479A30A3.7050305@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:31 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: trim ram need to check if mtrr is there v3

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM> wrote:
>
>   
>> [PATCH] x86: trim ram need to check if mtrr is there v3
>>     
>
>   
>>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Looks like the code doesn't check that the CPU *has* MTRRs...
>>>       
>> so more strict check if mtrr is there really.
>> bail out if mtrr all blank when qemu cpu model is used
>>
>> and check if is AMD as early
>> also remove 4G less check, according to hpa.
>>     
>
> thanks, applied. Shouldnt we put in an exception for when there is MTRR 
> support, but they dont cover anything. Still emit a warning - but 
> booting up real slow is still better than losing all of RAM and crashing 
>   

The problem is re-occuring for me with current x86.git.  Looks like v2 
did the trick, and v3 is broken...

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/