[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <479A7463.7070801@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:44:35 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...cam.ac.uk>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@...hat.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
William Irwin <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11 of 11] x86: defer cr3 reload when doing pud_clear()
Keir Fraser wrote:
> Go read the Intel application note "TLBs, Paging-Structure Caches, and Their
> Invalidation" at http://www.intel.com/design/processor/applnots/317080.pdf
>
> Section 8.1 explains about the PDPTR cache in 32-bit PAE mode, which can
> only be refreshed by appropriate tickling of CR0, CR3 or CR4.
>
Yeah, I found that document, and mentioned it a little lower in the mail ;)
> It is also important to note that *any* valid page directory entry at *any*
> level in the page-table hierarchy can become cached at *any* time. Basically
> TLB lookup is performed as a longest-prefix match on the linear address to
> skip as many levels in a page-table walk as possible (where a walk is
> needed, because there is no full-length match on the linear address). So, if
> you modify a directory entry from present to not-present, or change the page
> directory that a valid pde points to, you probably need to flush the pde
> caching structure. One piece of good news is that all pde caches are flushed
> by any arbitrary INVLPG.
>
Hm, but then chapter 10 goes and makes things confusing with
"Alternative INVLPG Behavior"; but I guess if software needs to
explicitly enable this behaviour in a yet-to-be-determined way, its OK...
Is there any guide about the tradeoff of when to use invlpg vs flushing
the whole tlb? 1 page? 10? 90% of the tlb?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists