[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0801260024270.11589@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:25:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20 -v5] add notrace annotations for NMI routines
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
> > This annotates NMI functions with notrace. Some tracers may be able
> > to live with this, but some cannot. So we turn off NMI tracing.
> >
> > One solution might be to make a notrace_nmi which would only turn
> > off NMI tracing if a trace utility needed it off.
> >
> Is this still needed with the atomic clocksource read ?
>
Before you ask again, I've still included this in -v6, simply because I
didn't get a chance to test it without this patch. I'll try to remember to
do that on Monday.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists