| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080126220106.4c1c2d5b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:01:06 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: jason.wessel@...driver.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] [KGDB] core code cleanups > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:28:36 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: > > * Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com> wrote: > > > This patch is against the x86-git which included the kgdb core. > > > > Per review request from the x86-git maintainers, the kgdb-core has had > > the kgdb_handle_exception() separated into individual functions. This > > patch does nothing other than re-organize the code. There are no > > functional kgdb changes. > > > > kgdb_handle_exception now calls gdb_serial_stub() to handle the > > debugger communications. The gdb_serial_stub() has call out to sub > > handlers for all the major gdb serial packet types. > > thanks Jason, i have applied your cleanups to x86.git. > I don't recall having actually seen the kgdb patches recently. Have they had a suitable level of review? In particular, as the plan is to migrate all kgdb-enabled architectures onto the generic kgdb core (yes?), have the owners of the eligible architectures actually taken a look at what we'll be asking of them? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists