linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080129230315.GA13389@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:03:15 +0100
From:	Andreas Mohr <andim2@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	andi@...as.de
Cc:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bunk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs...

Hi,

On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> Thanks for your quick reply!
> 
> OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff.
> (preliminary posting, for review only)
> 
> Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble,
> thus might want to do -mm testing soon.

Any verdict on this one?

I happen to be asking now since silly me just ""upgraded"" a mere mortal's
sorta-production machine to 2.6.24 proper without remembering
that the previous -rc6 had contained a minor but effective change
to make those wires do their thing. Or, to tell it as it was,
"Mom wasn't impressed ;)".

Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?

Thanks,

Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/