| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <479FB225.7090604@intel.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:09:25 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com> To: andi@...as.de CC: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bunk@...nel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs... Andreas Mohr wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 09:09:08PM +0100, Andreas Mohr wrote: >> Thanks for your quick reply! >> >> OK, here's part 1, the MII-less support stuff. >> (preliminary posting, for review only) >> >> Note that these diffs apply to 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 without much trouble, >> thus might want to do -mm testing soon. > > Any verdict on this one? > > I happen to be asking now since silly me just ""upgraded"" a mere mortal's > sorta-production machine to 2.6.24 proper without remembering > that the previous -rc6 had contained a minor but effective change > to make those wires do their thing. Or, to tell it as it was, > "Mom wasn't impressed ;)". > > Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch > on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing? I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not happened due to time constraints - that should quickly at least confirm that the most common nics work OK after the change with your patch. I'll try and see if we can get this testing done soon. Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists