[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080130050721.GB22444@dallas.jonmasters.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:07:21 +0000
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Giridhar Pemmasani <pgiri@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:24:50AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Pavel Roskin <proski@....org> writes:
> >
> > static inline void add_taint_module(struct module *mod, unsigned flag)
> > {
> > add_taint(flag);
> > mod->taints |= flag;
> > }
> >
> > The module taint is set before the symbols are resolved. Therefore, the
> > GPL-only symbols won't be resolved.
>
> I think using a separate taint flag that does not disable GPL symbols
> for the ndiswrapper case would be a fair solution. After all the main
> motivation for tainting ndiswrapper is to make it visible in oopses, but not
> prevent it from loading in the first place.
>
> How about you submit an incremental patch to do that?
I'll happily submit a patch to do whateve is wanted, and add comments
(I'm also debugging seveal module issues right now, so I have a
good opportunity to look over some of the code).
But do we want to:
*). Add a new taint?
*). Move it later?
It's all trivial, but a policy should be established for the future.
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists