[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080130050424.GA22444@dallas.jonmasters.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:04:24 +0000
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Cc: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Giridhar Pemmasani <pgiri@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:48:21PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:20 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > Yes it is. But I thought the existing code was intending to taint the
> > kernel (that's what it does), so it would really help to identify why it
> > tainted the kernel, by calling add_taint_module instead of add_taint. I
> > didn't put the existing match in there...don't shoot the messenger :)
>
> So, it's the same thing as in year 2006. Good intentions, unexpected
> side effects, and a long discussion.
I wouldn't quite say that. I wasn't going to comment, but...personally,
I actually disagree with the assertions that ndiswrapper isn't causing
proprietary code to link against GPL functions in the kernel (how is
an NDIS implementation any different than a shim layer provided to
load a graphics driver?), but I wasn't trying to make that point.
Rusty - shall we just move the taint to post symbol resolution?
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists