[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801300836030.12371@anakin>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:38:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ndiswrapper and GPL-only symbols redux
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> writes:
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:25:22PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> >> As long as you don't distribute /proc/kcore, I can't see how the GPL
> >> would have any say in the matter. The Windows drivers are (unrelated
> >> violations aside) clearly not derived from GPL code.
> >
> > Someone might sell a laptop with Linux installed?
>
> Not a problem, unless it is booted when sold. Even that might not be
> a problem, since it would be a matter of transferring ownership of a
> single copy, not creating and distributing new copies, and the GPL
> does is only concerned with the latter.
Interesting... I never heard about this `transferring ownership of a
single copy not involving GPL'.
Note that some lawyers claim that at trade shows, you should not hand over
a demo device running GPLed code to any interested party, as it would be
distribution...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists