linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: increse MAX_EARLY_RES for NODE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801300357.54924.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:57:54 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: increse MAX_EARLY_RES for NODE_DATA and bootmap

On Tuesday 29 January 2008 20:16, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [PATCH 4/4] x86_64: increse MAX_EARLY_RES for NODE_DATA and bootmap
>
> otherise early_node_mem will use up these for 8 nodes system

Yes this was the problem with my early_reserve node bootmem patch.
It adds a node limit.

But even with increasing the limit is far too small. Probably best to not 
use the patch. In theory it should not have been needed anyways because
there is no need to reserve here because there are no interfering users.

Whatever your problem is it needs to be solved differently.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/