[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080130.115943.85421886.usui@mxm.nes.nec.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:59:43 +0900 (JST)
From: Minoru Usui <usui@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, magnus.damm@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NUMA emulation for x86_64
>>>>> ">" == Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>> * Minoru Usui <usui@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
>> I found a small bug of NUMA emulation code for x86_64.
>> (CONFIG_NUMA_EMU) If machine is non-NUMA, find_node_by_addr() should
>> return NUMA_NO_NODE, but current implementation code returns existent
>> maximum NUMA node number + 1. This is not existent NUMA node number.
>>
>> However, this behaviour does not affect NUMA emulation fortunately,
>> because acpi_fake_nodes() that is caller of find_node_by_addr() gets
>> pxm (proximity domain) by node_to_pxm() from non-existent NUMA node
>> number that was returned by find_node_by_addr(). node_to_pxm() returns
>> PXM_INVAL that means illegal or non-existent NUMA node number.
>> thanks, i have applied your fix to x86.git.
>> It seems this does not need to be backported to v2.6.24.1 because
>> node_to_pxm() masked the bad effects of this bug, right?
>> Ingo
I think this bug is not urgency.
If you mean that it's not necessary to release 2.6.24.1 only for this
bug, I think so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists