[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080131074436.GA31966@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:44:36 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Value of __*{init,exit} anotations?
> >
> > I don't deny we can invest large amounts of work to fix our current
> > issues and build large scriptable checks to ensure we keep it fixed ...
> > I'm just asking if, at the end of the day, it's really worth it.
>
> Some people consider it worth it for their memory restricted systems
> and would like to drive the annotations even further. [1]
>
> My experience while fixing section bugs during the last years is that
> the __dev{init,exit}* are actually the main question since they are both
> the majority of annotations and the ones that bring benefits only
> in a case that has become very exotic (CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n).
Some numbers...
I my current tree with an allyesconfig build for x86 64bit I see:
136 Section mismatch warnings in total
99 Section mismatch warnings from drivers/
This is with a few patches of mine applied but none of the recently
posted fixes by Adrian.
I am concentrating on:
drivers/pci/
kernel/
mm/
Will post my patches during the weekend if things goes well.
There are some low hanging fruits in drivers/ but I stay away
from these from now expecting others to fix these.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists