[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801310642.54632.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:42:54 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Value of __*{init,exit} anotations?
> Some people consider it worth it for their memory restricted systems
> and would like to drive the annotations even further. [1]
They could get much better bang-for-the-buck (as in memory saved
for amount of work invested) by tackling some the dynamic memory allocation
pigs.
In general it's a trade off between how much work and patch churn versus
benefit, and some of the annotations really don't look too good on this
scale.
> People at linux-arch (Cc'ed) might be better at explaining how often
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG gets used in real-life systems and how big the savings
> are there.
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is widely used for suspend on multi core systems.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists