linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:32:26 +0100
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	travis@....com,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * travis@....com <travis@....com> wrote:
> 
> > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h
> 
> do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it 
> been tested on s390?

Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the last
5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version dropped
it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already upstream
with the (correct) acked line, see git commit
f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4.
So, what is the problem ?

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/