[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080131085013.GB1585@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:50:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: travis@....com,
Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: Use generic percpu linux-2.6.git
* Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 22:53 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * travis@....com <travis@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > Change s390 percpu.h to use asm-generic/percpu.h
> >
> > do the s390 maintainer agree with this change (Acks please), and has it
> > been tested on s390?
>
> Now I'm confused. The patch has been acked a few weeks ago and the
> last 5+ version of the patch had the acked line. The lastest version
> dropped it for a reason I don't know. And more, the patch is already
> upstream with the (correct) acked line, see git commit
> f034347470e486835ccdcd7a5bb2ceb417be11c4. So, what is the problem ?
the latest patch was sent without your acked line and i asked about
that. But later on Mike told me that you acked it - so i restored the
ack and the patch, Linus pulled the fixes and it now all is upstream and
all architectures should be fine again now.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists