[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080131121823.GF12571@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:18:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86: EFI memory mapping changes according to
changes to ioremap and c_p_a
* Huang, Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> + /* Assume pages are mapped as WB */
> + if (mode == IOR_MODE_UNCACHED)
> + set_memory_uc(md->virt_addr, md->num_pages);
> + /* Assume pages are mapped as unexecutable */
> + if ((__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_NX) &&
> + xmode == IOR_XMODE_EXEC)
> + set_memory_x(md->virt_addr, md->num_pages);
hm, why is the check for __supported_pte_mask needed? That is already
listened to in set_memory_x(). [if not then it's an ioremap bug that we
want to fix.]
> -static int ioremap_change_attr(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long size,
> - enum ioremap_mode mode,
> - enum ioremap_xmode xmode)
> +int ioremap_change_attr(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long size,
> + enum ioremap_mode mode,
> + enum ioremap_xmode xmode)
hm, there should be no need to use this raw API.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists