[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1201830304.3087.2.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:45:04 -0500
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Howlett <howlett@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Pull request: TASK_KILLABLE
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:48 +1100, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > To allow tasks to be interrupted by fatal signals, we introduce a new
> > TASK_* bit; TASK_WAKEKILL. We also add a predicate fatal_signal_pending;
> > the counterpart of signal_pending(). Then we add killable versions
> > of lock_page(), mutex_lock(), schedule_timeout(), wait_event(), and
> > wait_for_completion(). Finally, we can make the NFS 'intr' mount option
> > a no-op.
>
> Ok, I've pulled this. It conflicted with some NFS changes, but I did what
> appeared to be the obvious conflict resolution, and it all at least
> compiles and it looked sane to me. But I don't have NFS enabled normally,
> and I certainly don't have a good way to test with my laptop while in
> Melbourne, so Trond/Matthew, can you please double- and triple-check my
> merge?
Hmm... The current code won't compile as a module. We're at least going
to require something like the attached patch.
Cheers
Trond
Download attachment "linux-2.6.24-000-export_fatal_signal_pending.dif" of type "message/rfc822" (804 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists