[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801311745080.24297@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:48:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Izik Eidus <izike@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, steiner@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
daniel.blueman@...drics.com
Subject: Re: mmu_notifier: close hole in fork
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Good catch! This was missing also in my #v5 (KVM doesn't need that
> because the only possible cows on sptes can be generated by ksm, but
> it would have been a problem for GRU). The more I think about it, the
How do you think the GRU should know when to drop the refcount? There is
no page table and thus no way of tracking that a refcount was taken.
Without the refcount you cannot defer the freeing of the page. So
shootdown on invalidate_range_begin and lock out until
invalidate_range_end seems to be the only workable solution.
BTW what do you think about adding a flag parameter to the invalidate
calls that allows shooting down writable ptes only? That could be useful
for COW and page_mkclean.
So
#define MMU_ATOMIC 1
#define MMU_WRITABLE 2
insted of the atomic parameter?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists