[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0802010711q744f5023mdbfccd9540556b70@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:11:43 +0100
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected)
On 01/02/2008, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> ---
> - restore the old wakeup mechanism
and how does it change behavior, logically-wise?
do we somehow miss a 'wake-up' from kthread_stop() so that its caller
gets blocked until watchdog's msleep_interruptible(10000) timeouts? On
average, it would take +-5 sec. and might explain the first
observation of Ravael -- "...adds a 5 - 10 sec delay..." (although,
lately he reported up to +30 sec. delays).
(/me goint to also try reproducing it later today)
> [ ... ]
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists