lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:10:22 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected) * Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com> wrote: > On 01/02/2008, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote: > > > --- > > - restore the old wakeup mechanism > > and how does it change behavior, logically-wise? > > do we somehow miss a 'wake-up' from kthread_stop() so that its caller > gets blocked until watchdog's msleep_interruptible(10000) timeouts? On > average, it would take +-5 sec. and might explain the first > observation of Ravael -- "...adds a 5 - 10 sec delay..." (although, > lately he reported up to +30 sec. delays). > > (/me goint to also try reproducing it later today) thanks - i cannot reproduce it on my usual suspend/resume testbox because e1000 broke on it, and this is a pretty annoying regression. We'll have to undo the hung-tasks detection feature if it's not fixed quickly. (there's no point in debugging features that _add_ bugs) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists