[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b647ffbd0802011354ra2b9494ub59475abad4466aa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:54:35 +0100
From: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected)
On 01/02/2008, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> thanks - i cannot reproduce it on my usual suspend/resume testbox
> because e1000 broke on it, and this is a pretty annoying regression.
> We'll have to undo the hung-tasks detection feature if it's not fixed
> quickly. (there's no point in debugging features that _add_ bugs)
I can reproduce it and Peter's patch does fix it for me.
e.g.
root@...th:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# time echo 0 > online
real 0m6.743s
root@...th:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1# time echo 0 > online
real 0m7.770s
I've observed delays from ~3 s. up to ~8 s. (out of ~20 tests) so the
10s. delay of msleep_interruptible() might be related but
I'm still looking for the reason why this fix helps (and what goes
wrong with the current code).
>
> Ingo
>
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists