[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080202161057.b240f443.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:10:57 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Russell Leidich" <rml@...gle.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
"Tim Hockin" <thockin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:33 -0800 "Russell Leidich" <rml@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Here's the hopefully-final version of the patch, which I have just
> > tested on Intel and AMD.
Curious. This just broke.
i386 allmodconfig:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o: In function `smp_thermal_interrupt':
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c:61: multiple definition of `smp_thermal_interrupt'
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.o:arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.c:17: first defined here
/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: size of symbol `smp_thermal_interrupt' changed from 4 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.o to 43 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o
/opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: type of symbol `smp_thermal_interrupt' changed from 1 to 2 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o
In mainline we just did this:
--- linux-2.6.24/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c 2008-02-01 14:29:18.000000000 -0800
+++ devel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c 2008-02-02 15:38:06.000000000 -0800
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void intel_thermal_interrupt(stru
/* Thermal interrupt handler for this CPU setup */
static void (*vendor_thermal_interrupt)(struct pt_regs *regs) = unexpected_thermal_interrupt;
-fastcall void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
+void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
which I think was always wrong and has just now tripped up the linker. I
_assume_ that function should be __attribute__((weak)). Then again, maybe
I'm full of it. But hey, it compiles now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists