linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1201998460.1844.32.camel@brick>
Date:	Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:27:40 -0800
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Russell Leidich <rml@...gle.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
	Tim Hockin <thockin@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AMD Thermal Interrupt Support

On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 16:10 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:06:33 -0800 "Russell Leidich" <rml@...gle.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Here's the hopefully-final version of the patch, which I have just
> > > tested on Intel and AMD.
> 
> Curious.  This just broke.
> 
> i386 allmodconfig:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o: In function `smp_thermal_interrupt':
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c:61: multiple definition of `smp_thermal_interrupt'
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.o:arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.c:17: first defined here
> /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: size of symbol `smp_thermal_interrupt' changed from 4 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_thermal.o to 43 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o
> /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.0-glibc-2.3.6/i686-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/i686-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Warning: type of symbol `smp_thermal_interrupt' changed from 1 to 2 in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.o
> 
> In mainline we just did this:
> 
> --- linux-2.6.24/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c        2008-02-01 14:29:18.000000000 -0800
> +++ devel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c       2008-02-02 15:38:06.000000000 -0800
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void intel_thermal_interrupt(stru
>  /* Thermal interrupt handler for this CPU setup */
>  static void (*vendor_thermal_interrupt)(struct pt_regs *regs) = unexpected_thermal_interrupt;
>  
> -fastcall void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 
> which I think was always wrong and has just now tripped up the linker.  I
> _assume_ that function should be __attribute__((weak)).  Then again, maybe
> I'm full of it.  But hey, it compiles now.
> 

What tree fails to compile?

grepping mainline:

./arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel_64.c:asmlinkage void smp_thermal_interrupt(void)
./arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/p4.c:void smp_thermal_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
./arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:   apicinterrupt THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR,smp_thermal_interrupt
./arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c:asmlinkage void __attribute__((weak)) smp_thermal_interrupt(void)

Notice the one in p4.c doesn't take void args.

I'll look into it.

Harvey


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/